Singapore Is Paying People to Put Down Their Phones and Read Books

(gadgetreview.com)

106 points | by geox 3 hours ago

11 comments

  • tombert 1 hour ago
    I read a lot, and I own a lot of physical books, but I almost never actually read physical books anymore. I'm one of the happy few that used my Kindle for more than a week after getting it as a gift.

    I find that reading on an ereader is many times easier for me, primarily because I can make the text gigantic and I don't lose track of my place on the page nearly as often. I'm not dyslexic (I've been tested), but I do think that there's some issue with my brain where if the text is small I really can't follow it. On all my computers the text is gigantic and even then I will click and highlight text as I'm reading so don't lose place. I would love to be paid to read but I don't think I'd love to be paid to read physical books.

    I remember my grandmother was wholly unconvinced that my Kindle was a different thing than an iPad or a Game Boy, and that it was not "real" reading, for whatever reason.

    • mulderc 1 hour ago
      One thing I do with my students is show them how to adjust text size and have them try out larger sizes. I think a surprisingly large number of people have never even attempted to change the text size on their devices and many can benefit from something different than the defaults.
      • tombert 1 hour ago
        I sort of discovered this accidentally twice.

        First was when I go the Kindle I realized I could make the text as big as I wanted so I would do that, as stated before.

        Another time is when I wanted an external monitor and I bought a big TV because it was much cheaper. Because the TV was bigger the text was also bigger, and I realized how much easier it was for me to work.

        I think I used to feel like there was a "coolness" factor to keeping the text small. I don't know why I thought that, but I think what's much cooler than having lots of small text is actually being able to read and understand the text on the screen.

        Now I have no desire to impress anyone, and I keep my text in the browser at like 200%.

      • cheschire 52 minutes ago
        Even on computer monitors, I always bump the scaling to 125% on modern high resolution screens.
    • matwood 1 hour ago
      I don't have a Kindle, but I've been reading books exclusively on my phone since I had a 3gs IIRC. I've increased the text size over the years and love having the 2-3 books I'm typically reading at once readily available.
    • walt_grata 1 hour ago
      I swap between kindle and audible daily. The syncing is generally good, byt i have had issues with some books.

      This alone has caused my reading to skyrocket. I swear i do 1-2 books a week this way

    • damontal 1 hour ago
      What’s annoying is when you want to look back at something earlier in the book. Then you have to use the clunky search and hope you don’t lose your current place.
      • tombert 1 hour ago
        KOReader has bookmark support; if I need to go back a few pages (or use the search), I'll just set a bookmark for my current place so I can easily jump back.
        • damontal 27 minutes ago
          Right so now we need a workflow to do something as simple as looking back a few pages. I know it’s necessary but it’s definitely a regression.
          • TeMPOraL 13 minutes ago
            The constraint here is the e-ink refresh rate. That constraint does not exist on regular screens, which is why I'm surprised neither mobile reader apps or even desktop software takes purposeful advantage of it: fast scrolling back with fine, per-page control, keeping page in-place and zero perceptible latency rendering full page. With a finger drag or click&drag movement, this can easily be even faster than with paper books.

            I know this works because I've seen it with some PDF readers on desktop in the past, when I lucked into a combination of lightweight document and right "fit page to display" scaling. And, of course, this works natively in browsers with PgUp/PgDown, but only on the few remaining websites that haven't been thoroughly shittified (no "en-" there on purpose) with JavaScript and excessive styling.

    • lofaszvanitt 59 minutes ago
      An you bought one for her.
  • kingstnap 2 hours ago
    The headline makes it seem more monetary than it actually is.

    https://www.read.gov.sg/join-the-readsg-challenge

    It seems like turning points into money is just a happens to exist sort of mechanic. Enough to write a headline that they are technically "paying you". The real mechanics are much more typical gamification. Like earning xp, streaks, leaderboards, limited edition goodies at events, prize draws, collective goals.

    The strict money payout is S$0.02 per 15 minutes at most once a day. Obviously if you were doing this it would be more for the rest of the dopamine then hoping to buy a candy bar after like 50 days.

    • juiceland 46 minutes ago
      Systems like this are not new. When I was in elementary school in the US Midwest, we had a program called accelerated reader, (AR), where you could take tests about books and get points. The longer the book, the more the points. You could redeem the points for candy.

      Anyway I was banned from AR in the 5th grade because I learned you could sort the book list by points awarded, so I wrote down the list of most valuable books and checked them out from the library. I convinced a 2 friends to help, one would take the test and write down the questions and then someone else would read the book to get the answers and share them. We ended up racking up like way more points than anyone else and the teachers called out and made us explain.

      • startup_zombie_ 13 minutes ago
        You basically discovered the exploit in gamified reading before gamification had a name. I wonder how many kids today would optimize the points system instead of actually reading the books.
      • jareklupinski 43 minutes ago
        yea a free candy bar for kids every 50 days for just reading sounds great
        • TeMPOraL 8 minutes ago
          Most kids will correctly recognize up front it's not worth the effort.
  • andsoitis 2 hours ago
    > to build daily reading habits among a phone-first population

    Reading is fundamental.

    EDIT: Other skills and habits that you can then build on reading: critical thinking, reasoning, detection and handling own biases, numeracy, financial literacy, and more. All these dimensions are manipulated via phones and the apps on them, so you need a firewall.

    Also: writing. Cursive writing.

    • aduwah 1 hour ago
      You being downvoted is just sad
      • xethos 1 hour ago
        Stating a truth is not adding to the conversation though. A little sad, sure, but grandparent's comment is barely even a building block to kick off a wider conversation, let alone thoughtful or additive on its own.

        Maybe it doesn't deserve to be on the bottom, dead, but something this basic certainly doesn't deserve to be showered in upvotes

  • lend000 1 hour ago
    While books > articles > audiobooks > podcasts > listening to music > TV > short-form content, it's all content consumption in the end, and while that's fine, I think it's a little overhyped.

    I prefer to draw the distinction at creating vs doing vs consuming, and focus on balancing the time spent consuming (which is a natural part of enjoying life, but usually people consume way too much) unless it's in the service of one of the other two categories (e.g. consuming articles to learn/inspire the creation of something better or plan a trip to do something, etc.)

    • grey-area 38 minutes ago
      No, it is not all just ‘content’ which is roughly the same and can be consumed like a snack. That’s a word used by people who think thoughts, feelings and stories are just carriers for advertising and selling you things.

      Words matter, don’t take your word choice from ad factories instagram which popularised this term.

      Reading (I won’t say consuming) a good book can stay with you forever. People from 2000 years ago can speak to you in their own voice from behind the grave. And you have the audacity to call it content and compare it to cat videos and call it ‘overhyped’?

  • at1as 40 minutes ago
    I feel fortunate that today's distractions didn't exist when I was younger (or I probably wouldn't read many books).

    Nowadays I "turn off" all the distractions that I can before bed to get a few pages in. Reading during the day is still pretty challenging if the book has dull bits (I recently finished the 3 body problem series. At it's peak, its some of the best sci-fi I've ever read. But some parts of the books were such a slog to get through. During those sections I often found myself reaching for my phone, just out of habit)

  • yipinwong 1 hour ago
    For me it's not the phone that's stopping me from reading books but my computer, on which I play games, and browse, and do private stuff.

    Where I live, electricity price is so ridiculous, I leave my PC off for 3 to 5 hours a day.

    You get bored after 5 minutes. This is the best time to open your book and read.

    ----

    Same idea applies for the phone. Just leave it off.

    • wbobeirne 1 hour ago
      It's difficult to turn your phone off if you have a spouse or children or other dependents who you can't drop communication with for hours at a time. But it's helpful to strip it down to the essentials so it doesn't double as an entertainment device.
      • downut 1 hour ago
        It is in actual fact not difficult to "drop communication with for hours at a time". This was the human norm for millenia, up to a decade or so ago. And given the toxic side effects of all this communication it's probably going to have to be worked out again.

        We raised a child with the principle that "No News is Good News". She turned out great! And she lives that way still. That constant level of screen stimulation is strictly not necessary for family happiness, and I think you all who think so have not really internalized what it means for a child to learn responsibility.

        See also free-range kids, and the social insanity that causes kids/parents to get arrested for eg playing in a park alone. There's a bunch of mental illness out there, and the screens are big reason why.

        Oh right. My beautiful daughter reads books constantly. Weird that, huh.

      • devin 1 hour ago
        To be sure, you absolutely can do this. I did it all the time as a kid. Nothing bad happened from being out of constant communication for hours.
      • yipinwong 1 hour ago
        You are focusing on things that never happened or never will happen.

        Phone is not the only communication you need for your kids or spouse.

      • kibwen 1 hour ago
        The need to be instantly reachable at a moment's notice is a modern anxiety that we successfully lived without until the mass penetration of cell phones 20 years ago. Your spouse and children will manage without being able to text you for a few hours, just like spouses and children did for the first 100,000 years of humans history.
        • andrepd 1 hour ago
          That's ridiculous. We have managed without electricity or antibiotics for 100,000 years too. Are you keen on reading by candlelight or dying of preventable infections?

          Instant messaging and calling is extremely valuable. Algorithmic social media is extremely noxious. Unfortunately, they both live on the same device.

          • ianm218 34 minutes ago
            A more apt comparison is would you be OK reading by candle light sometimes for a few hours? I would be, it’s perfectly fine to read for a few hours by a bright candle.
          • kibwen 51 minutes ago
            Comparing smartphones to antibiotics is somewhat ironic given that smartphone addiction is a disease, not a cure to one. There is no law of the universe that says that technology cannot create ills where previously there were none. I assure you that you are allowed to turn your phone off for hours, days, weeks, forever if you so choose, and your life may be better for it.
  • jareklupinski 40 minutes ago
    duolingo seems to have figured out how to get people to drop what they're doing to perform a task

    is there like a duolingo for books

    like a bookmark that annoys you if you havent moved it in too long

  • qurren 38 minutes ago
    They're going to have to try a lot harder than $1 for 50 days worth of reading, in a world where any time taken off from work is a risk.
    • Insanity 36 minutes ago
      What’s the risk? Not familiar enough with Singapore to judge that.
      • qurren 35 minutes ago
        Not Singapore specifically but in today's AI/tech world if you're not constantly working you're on the firing line.

        I'm in the Bay Area. It's Sunday morning and I'm working becasue I still need to pay for food, rent, and enormous medical bills and don't want to get fired, and I got yelled at by my director this morning on Slack because I'm not delivering fast enough despite squashing 12 months' worth of work into 4.

        I don't have time for books. Finding time for even exercise is hard.

        • Insanity 32 minutes ago
          This sounds like mostly a USA problem and not something that extrapolates well to other countries. I had a suspicion it’d come from a US point of view lol.

          EDIT: while more common in the US, if you are actually regularly working weekends, look for a better job. In my part of FAANG I rarely have to work weekends, although the occasional crunch time can happen.

          • qurren 31 minutes ago
            I've worked in Singapore before. It's not a chill work culture there either. In fact it's about the same.
  • itake 2 hours ago
    Singapore libraries are really annoying for foreigners because they don’t let you use the WiFi.

    Thailand at least gives you a 1 hour pass.

    Not that anyone asked but my ranking of public libraries in Asia

    1/ Taiwan

    2/ HK

    3/ Thailand

    4/ Laos (private libraries are cute, but hot…)

    4/ Vietnam (Bring your passport!)

    5/ Singapore

    I haven’t been to a library in Japan or S Korea. I tried working from a community center in Japan but I couldn’t figure how it works.

    • Onavo 1 hour ago
      It's not limited to their libraries. All of their public facilities are like this. Even their public swimming pools (not allowed to use them if you are a visitor, their digital ticketing system requires the local equivalent of a SSN). The official excuse is that it's tax payer subsidized.

      It's very much a classist country where you position in society is determined by your immigration status. Everything there is tiered based on whether you are a "citizen" (first class), permanent resident (second class), and you are in a permanent out group if you are not in the above two classes. And if you are a foreigner, whether you are a white "expat" or a Dubai -style indenture servant migrant worker. Valley tech bros are obsessed with that country but all that glitters is not gold.

      • ValentineC 56 minutes ago
        > Even their public swimming pools (not allowed to use them if you are a visitor, their digital ticketing system requires the local equivalent of a SSN). The official excuse is that it's tax payer subsidized.

        There's a FAQ specifically addressing this [1]:

        > If you do not have Singpass, you may still approach our pool or gym staff to buy single-entry passes.

        [1] https://ask.gov.sg/activesg/questions/clztixkjr00agracq0ys53...

      • graemep 1 hour ago
        [flagged]
  • DANmode 1 hour ago
    Yes, but without Pizza Hut involved, do they even stand a chance?
  • analog8374 2 hours ago
    They should be paying them to meditate. That would be the more healthful and revolutionary course.

    Regular daily intellectual concentration is much the same be it game, book or reddit. And it makes you crazy. You withdraw from reality.